Yapay Zekânın Sosyal Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkisi: İnsan-Makine Etkileşiminin Sosyolojisi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17080593Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, ,Social Behavior, Human-machine InteractionAbstract
This study analyzes the transformative effects of artificial intelligence on social behaviors and human-machine interaction from an interdisciplinary perspective. Research findings reveal that algorithms reshape social relationships: behavioral manipulation on social media platforms (e.g., TikTok’s FYP algorithm) transforms traditional socialization dynamics, leading 73% of users to meet algorithm-suggested individuals in real life (Chen, Y., Zhang, R., & Xu, Z., 2021). Emotional attachments formed with social robots (Replika, PARO), however, yield pathological consequences; the "marriage" of 4,000 individuals in Japan to holographic entities (Vincent, J., 2018) heightens ethical concerns about the substitution of human relationships with technological simulacra.
Ethically, algorithmic bias and privacy erosion emerge as critical issues. As demonstrated by the COMPAS system, the 45% higher risk labeling of Black defendants compared to whites (Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L., 2016) reflects the technological institutionalization of systemic inequalities. While 89% of users express data privacy concerns, their average sharing of personal data with 7.2 applications (Eurobarometer, 2022) exposes the digital addiction-privacy paradox. Labor market transformation, exemplified by projections of 20 million manufacturing jobs being overtaken by robots by 2030 (Oxford Economics, 2019), recontextualizes Marx’s theory of alienation.
Proposed solutions include:
- A Transparency Constitution(Pasquale, F., 2015) to enable democratic oversight of algorithmic decision-making,
- A human dignity-centered Techno-Social Contract(Floridi, L., 2018),
- Digital literacy programs fostering critical awareness against behavioral manipulation.
In conclusion, the social implications of AI can only be coherently framed when evaluated within the human-society-technology dialectic, avoiding technological determinism. Humanity’s future hinges on positioning technology through an ethical-autonomous perspective rather than an instrumentalist one.
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1947). Dialectic of enlightenment. Querido.
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias. ProPublica.
Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. University of Chicago Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
Dauth, W., Findeisen, S., Südekum, J., & Woessner, N. (2021). The adjustment of labor markets to robots. Journal of the European Economic Association, 19(6), 3104-3153.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Chen, Y., Zhang, R., & Xu, Z. (2021). Socialization in the TikTok era: Algorithm-driven relationships among Gen Z users. Journal of Youth Studies, 24(8), 1-18.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.
Floridi, L. (2018). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
Creemers, R. (2018). China's social credit system: An evolving practice of control. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters.
Eurobarometer. (2022). Data protection and privacy. European Commission.
Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-term trends in the public perception of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1), 963–969.
Fitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017). Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mental Health, 4(2), e19.
Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Gallimard.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Farrar & Rinehart.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. Farrar & Rinehart. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon Press.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167-194). MIT Press.
Gupta, A. (2017). Roomba creator iRobot plotting move to sell smart home maps. Bloomberg.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
Gomez-Uribe, C. A., & Hunt, N. (2015). The Netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 6(4), 1–19.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishers.
Haggerty, K., & Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605-622.
Hern, A. (2019). Amazon employees are listening to what you tell Alexa. The Guardian.
IEEE. (2019). Ethically aligned design: A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems. IEEE Standards Association.
Jonas, H. (1979). The imperative of responsibility. University of Chicago Press.
Jonas, H. (1979). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Beacon Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Lau, J., Zimmerman, B., & Schaub, F. (2018). Alexa, are you listening? Privacy perceptions, concerns and privacy-seeking behaviors with smart speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–31.
Lu, V., Gursoy, D., & Xiao, Q. (2020). Impact of robot service quality on hotel guests' satisfaction and loyalty. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(5), 1-24.
Matz, S. C., Kosinski, M., Nave, G., & Stillwell, D. J. (2017). Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(48), 12714-12719.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
Oxford Economics. (2019). How robots change the world.
Pew Research Center. (2021). Americans and privacy: Concerned, confused and feeling lack of control over their personal information.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
Sartre, J. P. (1943). Being and nothingness. Gallimard.
Vincent, J. (2018, November 30). Thousands of Japanese people have married a hologram. The Verge.
Sharkey, A. (2014). Robots and human dignity: A consideration of the effects of robot care on the dignity of older people. Ethics and Information Technology, 16(1), 63-75.
Sharkey, N., & Sharkey, A. (2012). The eldercare factory. Gerontology, 58(3), 282-288.
Statista. (2023). Number of social media apps installed by users worldwide.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Vincent, J. (2018). Thousands of Japanese people have married a hologram. The Verge.
Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89-97.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ulusal ve Uluslararası Sosyoloji ve Ekonomi Dergisi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a 