Can Gig Work Create Opportunities for the Economic Participation of Disadvantaged Groups? A Qualitative Study of Persons with Disabilities in Türkiye and Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17071728Keywords:
Gig Work, Disabilities, Disadvantaged GroupsAbstract
Gigwork is conceptualised as a new form of employment that has emerged from the rapid advancement of information technologies and the acceleration of globalisation. Driven by the impact of digitalisation on labour markets, it has expanded considerably, particularly with the widespread diffusion of remote and project-based working practices—a trend further accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. While this form of employment carries advantages such as additional income generation and a flexible working culture, it has also been associated with the concept of the precariat in some studies, due to income insecurity linked to the discontinuity of work and the inadequacy of social security provisions. This study, however, approaches gig work from a different perspective by seeking to answer whether it can serve as an opportunity for the economic participation of disadvantaged groups, particularly individuals with disabilities. Within this scope, the perceptions, motivations, and evaluations of a group of people with disabilities in Zimbabwe and Türkiye regarding gig work were analysed through discourse analysis, supported by existing debates and findings in the literature. The research concludes that gig work is appropriate business model for disadvantaged groups by providing supplementary income, mitigating workplace discrimination and stigmatisation, offering opportunities to showcase skills, and facilitating work-based rehabilitation. Nonetheless, gig work may adversely impact socio-economically disadvantaged groups due to job and income instability, absence of social security benefits, and the exacerbation of inequalities in access to information technologies.
References
Aile ve Çalışma Bakanlığı. (2019). Engelliler için bilgilendirme rehberi., çevrimiçi erişim tarihi: 10.01.2025,
Bajwa, U., Gastaldo, D., Ruggiero, E. D., & Knorr, L. (2018). The health of workers in the global gig economy. Globalization and Health, 14(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0444-8
Bendick, M., Jackson, C. W., & Reinoso, V. A. (1994). Measuring employment discrimination through controlled experiments. Review of Black Political Economy, 23(1), 25–48.
Bruyère, S. M. (2017). The futures of work and people with disabilities (Work Paper). Cornell University.
Campion, E. D. (2019). The gig economy: An overview and set of recommendations for practice. SIOP White Paper Series.
Codagnone, C., Abadie, F., & Biagi, F. (2016). The future of work in the ‘sharing economy’: Market efficiency and equitable opportunities or unfair precarisation? JRC Science for Policy Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Engelli ve Yaşlı Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. (2020). Engelli ve yaşlı istatistik bülteni. https://www.ailevecalisma.gov.tr/media/42250/istatistik-bulteni-2020-mart.pdf
European Parliament. (2017). The social protection of workers in the platform economy. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2017)614184
Fisher, R. S., Acharya, J. N., Baumer, F. M., French, J. A., Parisi, P., Solodar, J. H., ... & Kasteleijn‐Nolst Trenité, D. (2022). Visually sensitive seizures: An updated review by the Epilepsy Foundation. Epilepsia, 63(4), 739-768.
Friedman, G. C. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03
Harpur, P., & Blanck, P. (2020). Gig workers with disabilities: Opportunities, challenges, and regulatory response. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30(4), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09891-3
ICDS. (2017). Inter-Censal Demographic Survey 2017. United Nations Population Fund. https://zimbabwe.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Inter%20Censal%20Demography%20Survey%202017%20Report.pdf
ILO Global Business and Disability Network. (2018). Making the future of work inclusive of people with disabilities. http://www.businessanddisability.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/PDF_acc_FoW_PwD.pdf
Jones, M., & Latreille, P. (2011). Disability and self-employment: Evidence for the UK. Applied Economics, 43(27), 4161–4178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.489816
Kaine, S., & Josserand, E. (2019). The organisation and experience of work in the gig economy. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185619865480
Karadeniz, O. (2025). The platform workers in Türkiye: An evaluation in terms of the Turkish social security and tax law. In Informal work and the protection of social rights: The gray areas of employment (pp. 179–188). IGI Global.
McDonald, P., Williams, P., Stewart, A., Oliver, D., & Mayes, R. (2019). Digital platform work in Australia: Preliminary findings from a national survey.
Mtetwa, E. (2018). Disability and the challenge of employment in Zimbabwe: A social protection perspective. African Journal of Social Work, 8(2), 78–84.
Mugumbate, J., & Mtetwa, E. (2014). People with disabilities in Zimbabwe. In Promoting social work for Zimbabwe’s development (pp. 1–16).
Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital platforms, gig economy, precarious employment, and the invisible hand of social class. International Journal of Health Services, 48(4), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731418801413
Onkokame, M., Schoentgen, A., & Gillwald, A. (2018). What is the state of microwork in Africa? A view from seven countries. Research ICT Africa. https://researchictafrica.net/after-access_the-state-of-microwork-in-africa/
Öz, C. S., & Orhan, S. (2013). Engelli istihdam yöntemleri üzerine. İstihdamda 3İ Dergisi, 9, 52–55.
Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975. https://doi.org/10.1086/374403
Pesole, A., Urzí Brancati, M. C., Fernández-Macías, E., Biagi, F., & González Vázquez, I. (2017). COLLEEM survey: Platform workers in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Schur, L. (2002). Dead end jobs or a path to economic wellbeing? The consequences of non-standard work among people with disabilities. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(6), 601–620.
Shier, M., Graham, J. R., & Jones, M. E. (2009). Barriers to employment as experienced by disabled people: A qualitative analysis in Calgary and Regina, Canada. Disability & Society, 24(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802535485
Ulu, S., & Kutanis, R. Ö. (2016). İşgücü piyasalarında ayrımcılığın kaynakları. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35, 359–372.
Unesco. (2019). Aspirations, needs and concerns of women and girls with disabilities in Zimbabwe: Abridged qualitative study. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372503
United Nations General Assembly. (2013). The ICT opportunity for a disability-inclusive development framework (pp. 1–62).
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
World Health Organization. (2011). Global health report 2010.
Yamamoto, S., Unruh, D., & Bullis, M. (2011). The viability of self-employment for individuals with disabilities in the United States: A synthesis of the empirical-research literature. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35(2), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2011-0559
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ulusal ve Uluslararası Sosyoloji ve Ekonomi Dergisi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.